福島第一 Fukushima ☢ Nuclear Blast?
Professor Christopher Busby: "I believe
that the explosion of the No 3 reactor may have also involved
criticality but this must await the release of data on measurements of
the Xenon isotope ratios." [*]
As evidence that a nuclear
explosion could happen at a nuclear-power plant, Busby cited recent
findings that the Chernobyl explosion may have been driven by a release
of nuclear energy, not chemical (hydrogen) energy as has been assumed.
These important findings were reported in a paper in Pure and Applied
Geophysics
http://www.springerlink.com/content/d71710g0012116x4/
that reads:
"The
alternative version [ of how Chernobyl exploded ] is based on the
assumption of a large instant energy release of nuclear energy.
Convincing evidence in favor of this version was for the first time
obtained by Radium Institute employees on the basis of an analysis of
atmospheric xenon radionuclide samples collected in the area of
Cherepovetz and of the analysis of the value of 133Xe/133mXe isomers
activity ratios. [...] it should be acknowledged that the hypothesis of a
nuclear mechanism of enormous instant energy yield in the Chernobyl
accident seems quite convincing, as is supported by experimental data;
these data are in good agreement with the calculated results."
翻訳 http://translate.google.com
教授クリストファーBusbyさん："私は3号炉の爆発は、臨界関与している可能性がありますが、これはキセノン同位体比の測定上のデータのリリースを待たなければならな
核爆発は、原子力発電所で発生する可能性がありますことを示す証拠として、バズビーは、チェルノブイリの爆発（水素）エネルギーになると推定されてきた原子力エネルギーで
http://www.springerlink.com/content/d71710g0012116x4/
"[はチェルノブイリが爆発した方法]を別のバージョンの原子力エネルギーの大規模なインスタントエネルギー放出の前提に基づいています。このバージョンの有利な証拠を説
#
Nuclear
engineer Arnie Gundersen observes that the explosion of Fukushima Unit 3
was a *detonation* which therefore can't be explained by a hydrogen-gas
explosion alone. Joining Professor Busby, Gundersen posits a nuclear
(not hydrogen gas) explosion to explain the massive blast of Unit 3...
原子力技術ア Arnie Gundersen さんは、福島3号機の爆発したがって、単独で水素ガスの爆発では説明できない*デトネーション*されたことを観察する。教授バズビーへの参加、Gundersenさんは、
See: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B9lv5foUItM
#
Dr Busby on Chernobyl and Fukushima Unit 3:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EGieX3Pfg_w#t=9m28s
Dr Busby's site: http://llrc.org
Tepco's Unit-3 blast press release
http://www.tepco.co.jp/en/press/corp-com/release/11031402-e.html
Special thanks to HyperIndividualist for feedback and research support toward this video!
[*] http://www.infowars.com/top-scientist-fukushima-meltdown-could-experience-ato...
Fukushima Unit 3 ☢ Two Theories - 福島第一原発3号機
GoddardsJournal さんが 2011/05/04 にアップロード
In this Unit-3 update the fact that Unit 1 had weaker
upper-deck walls is considered as a possible causal factor in the differences
between the Unit 1 and 3 explosions. Also considered is how the stronger walls
of Unit 3 might have helped a hydrogen explosion initiate a prompt
criticality.
本ユニット-3アップデートでは1号機は弱い上部デッキの壁を持っていたという事実は、ユニット1と3の爆発の違いの可能性因果因子として考えられている。また、3号機の
#
Supplemental
Evidence That Unit-1 Walls Differed From Units 3 & 4
GE's
Mark-1-reactor illustration shows weaker upper-deck structure seen on Unit 1: http://clubtroppo.com.au/files/2011/03/GE_BWR_cut-away.jpg
Upper-deck
walls inside Unit 3 seen here:
http://www.tepco.co.jp/nu/f1-np/info/2010/b110028-j.html
Examples
of solid concrete construction of Unit 4 at upper-deck section (as seen in this
video, the infrastructure of Unit 3 matches Unit 4):
http://whatworldnews.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/reaktor-nuklir.jpg
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CqMes7_OAlw
Photo from
upper-deck interior showing non-concrete walls and lattice girders (NPP unknown,
but containment matches Unit 1)
http://www.nucleartourist.com/images/rflg-fl1.jpg
Photos
of Corrugated Sheet-Metal Siding Used for Unit-1 Walls Blown Off on Ground
http://www.tepco.co.jp/en/news/110311/images/110429_1f_1.jpg
http://www.tepco.co.jp/en/news/110311/images/110429_1f_2.jpg
#
Contrary
to conventional theory, it may be the case that nuclear power plants can have
nuclear explosions. Recent findings indicate the Chernobyl explosion may have
been driven by an explosive release of nuclear energy, not a hydrogen explosion
are previously assumed. These important findings were reported in a paper in
'Pure and Applied Geophysics'
http://www.springerlink.com/content/d71710g0012116x4/
which
reads:
"The alternative version [ of how Chernobyl exploded ] is based on
the assumption of a large instant energy release of nuclear energy. Convincing
evidence in favor of this version was for the first time obtained by Radium
Institute employees on the basis of an analysis of atmospheric xenon
radionuclide samples collected in the area of Cherepovetz and of the analysis of
the value of 133Xe/133mXe isomers activity ratios. [...] it should be
acknowledged that the hypothesis of a nuclear mechanism of enormous instant
energy yield in the Chernobyl accident seems quite convincing, as is supported
by experimental data; these data are in good agreement with the calculated
results."
翻訳 http://translate.google.com
核爆発は、原子力発電所で発生する可能性がありますことを示す証拠として、バズビーは、チェルノブイリの爆発（水素）エネルギーになると推定されてきた原子力エネルギーで
http://www.springerlink.com/content/d71710g0012116x4/
"[はチェルノブイリが爆発した方法]を別のバージョンの原子力エネルギーの大規模なインスタントエネルギー放出の前提に基づいています。このバージョンの有利な証拠を説
'慧 > 核' 카테고리의 다른 글
| 「放射線の健康への影響」児玉龍彦氏（内容完全書き出し）衆議院厚生労働委員会7/27 (0) | 2011.08.04 |
|---|---|
| 실시간(1시간 단위) 한반도 주변 해역(동해, 태평양) 풍향풍속 상황 Map (0) | 2011.08.03 |
| 후쿠시마 원전사고, 우리가 몰랐던 진실 (0) | 2011.07.21 |
| 독일 기상청의 6월 23일에서 26일 00시까지의 시뮬레이션 결과입니다. (0) | 2011.06.23 |
| 6월 23일 전남 전북 등 호남지방 방사능수치 계측 (0) | 2011.06.23 |